SB127: An Act Concerning the Sale of Electric Vehicles in the State

TO: Connecticut State Legislators
RE: SB127: An Act Concerning the Sale of Electric Vehicles in the State
 
I am writing you today to ask you to oppose SB 127: An Act Concerning the Sale of Electric Vehicles in the State, more commonly known as the Tesla Loophole Bill. This is the seventh year in a row that this bill has come before the legislature. This legislation hurts consumers and jeopardizes local jobs.
 
The proposed bill will allow out-of-state electric vehicle manufacturers to sell to consumers directly, therefore bypassing the consumer protection regulations that all car dealerships in Connecticut must follow. This bill is not necessary because Tesla and other electric vehicle manufacturers are free under current law to sell their cars through the franchise system. Connecticut’s locally owned auto dealers, who are experienced in selling electric vehicles, have offered to welcome Tesla into the franchise system and sell its products in our state.
 
Connecticut’s auto dealers are committed to marketing, selling, and servicing electric vehicles. Several major automobile manufacturers, who are partnered with Connecticut auto dealers, have committed to going all electric in the coming years. Electric vehicles are already available at many local dealerships.
 
The retail auto industry in Connecticut and the region provides substantial economic benefit to the state in the form of jobs, tax revenue and community involvement. In contrast, Tesla is an online company based in California and has no local economic commitment. With so many important budgetary and economic issues facing the state, we should stick with a sure thing - the franchise system that was responsible last year for $10.3 billion dollars in sales and over 17% of all retail sales in our state. The dealerships throughout the state employ over 14,000 people in well-paying jobs. They offer benefits, job training, and career advancement.
 
Dealerships in Connecticut pay a significant amount in property taxes, which is of great importance to the local community and the state. Tesla may open a small display store here, but it does not compare to the benefits of a normal dealership.
 
I urge you to oppose SB 127: An Act Concerning the Sale of Electric Vehicles in the State. Thank you for your time. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
 
Sincerely,
 
Tony Sheridan
President and CEO